That’s just favorable spin, imo. No more trustworthy than unfavorable spin.
Plus it’s the NYT and WPOST...which adds demerits...
LOL! Ignoring the point and dismissing the source isn’t a good tactic...
From Forbes:
Baby Boomers, Not Recession, Behind Drop In Workforce
To hear most economists tell it, the prolonged recession has caused millions of Americans to leave the labor force. retirement
Perhaps though theres another story there. Maybe its just the baby boomers.
Baby boomers, the generation born between 1946 and 1964, started reaching the conventional retirement age, 65, last year. That would certainly have many of them leaving their jobs and heading toward the doors. Its their exit from the labor force that could explain why the labor-force participation rate has fallen from 66% at the end of 2007 to near 63.9% today, a group of Barclays Capital economists argue in a new report.
Just how can baby boomers afford to retire?
Well, the average American is just that: average. He or she belongs to Middle America. Theyre mostly reliant on Social Security in their golden years, and dont have a lot tied up in the equities market, the Barclays Capital economists say. These folks werent that badly hurt by the wild swings over the past couple yearswhere financials like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase have only recently rallied. And they probably arent chasing the next hot tech stocks either. Looking at you, Zynga. (Although a smattering of Apple in any portfolio wouldnt hurt these days.)
Clearly, some households are likely not living as well in retirement as they would have if asset prices had continued to make new highs every year or the labor market had not weakened, and the drop in wealth has likely delayed retirement for some households, the economists, Dean Maki, Troy Davig and Peter Newland, write.
According to the report, just a third of the drop in labor force participation came from those who still wanted a joband only 15% of those folks are of prime working age, 25 to 54. So, the economists see the possibility of a large and sudden return of previously discouraged job seekers to the labor force as remote.
This would be good for the bearish holdouts on the economic recovery.
Those skeptics say the dropping unemployment rate mostly is from a drop in able-bodied people quitting the job search (and lowering labor force participation). And, they say, when the economy does pick back up, those folks will want back in. So, when they re-enter, the falling unemployment becomes the rising unemployment rate.
But if the Barclays economists are right, and the labor-force participation decrease is from baby boomers retiring, then we wont see a large increase in labor force participation later. Or a rise in the unemployment rate.