He is Half right, NONE of the proposed laws would stop a criminal or mentally deranged person from obtaining a firearm and going on a rampage. All we can do is be prepared for them.
Nothing will guarantee that they’ll never happen again.
The best thing we can do is get rid of the gun free zones and allow staff to be armed if they wish.
Mass shooters aren’t gamblers. They plan and they plan to die. If they don’t know who might be armed it throws a big element of chance into their planning. That might very well be the one thing that will deter most of them.
I read this as “...unless we also disarm everyone too.”
I’m curious why all the Obama/Biden crowd doesn’t immediately comply and turn in all their guns? I thought they support them in their disregard of 2A? Why would a Dem need a gun?
He covered himself nicely here with the word “totally,” didn’t he. He can always claim gun-grabbing prevented some, but not ALL. No way to prove it, is there.
“....new laws won’t totally end gun massacres”
.
How profound.
The new laws will not end gun violence simply because they will not change the nature of those who are inclined to carry them out.
It is certain that the disarming of law abiding citizens will only result in an increase of gun violence.
What PROFOUND deep thinking. I'm thoroughly impressed by the DEPTH of his statement. /s