Posted on 02/02/2013 7:01:42 PM PST by hawkeye101
That’s the point all his friends made: he hadn’t seen a doctor, he had a previous heart condition; he was living on the edge and was never resting. Everyone who knew him knew this. His father-in-law knew this. Adam knew this. His wife knew this. To make a conspiracy out of this is just nonsense when the people closest to him reject that out of hand.
LOL -- but no, I can't stand at a chalkboard with my back to you and catch you between the eyebrows with an inch-long piece of chalk the instant you pass a note to Debbie Paternostro ..... I'm just not up to Sister Agona standards of pedagogy. ;) </Blues Brothers>
His friends (for some reason the name Bill Whittle comes to mind, but I’m not sure who it was) claimed that he had had a massive heart attack 6 months earlier that had put him in the hospital for 2 weeks. Others said that he had moved his office so he wouldn’t have to walk so far because he had such heart problems (but he wouldn’t take prescription pills for that heart condition?)
One of the early reports had his father-in-law saying that he had no history of heart problems. That was the same article that cited the coroner saying that he hadn’t seen a doctor for the last year. Then over time the stories changed.
Surely you must see how that looks to the rest of the world. Did he move his office because his heart problems were so severe that he was afraid to walk as far as his first office was? Did he have a massive heart attack 6 months before he died, that put him in the hospital for 2 weeks? If not, then why did his friends make those claims?
Did he refuse to take prescription meds for his heart condition? My understanding is that those meds stay in the body for a while so this isn’t just a matter of him forgetting to take it a day or two.
It’s also been pointed out that if Andrew had a history of heart problems that would be all the more reason for an assassination to use a heart attack inducing drug to make it appear to be a natural death.
What is it that makes you so absolutely sure that this was not an assassination - especially in view of the timing? Two events were planned for that day: Andrew’s pre-announced unveiling of tapes incriminating to Obama, and Sheriff Arpaio’s pre-announced press conference regarding Obama’s birth certificate. Andrew spoke to Sheriff Arpaio less than 5 hours before his death and said that Arpaio’s evidence of forgery of both the BC and draft registration was good.
The same day that Andrew died (and that Arpaio gave his press conference, and that Andrew had planned to release incriminating tapes...), Rush Limbaugh received a package referring to 2 famous assassinations, which his team interpreted as a threat. That is a convergence, in one day, of 2 anticipated devastating disclosures, one death, and one assassination threat.
Why would you be so sure that all that is just “coincidence” - to the point that anybody who suggests otherwise is labeled a crazy conspiracy theorist?
And add to that the aresenic poisoning of a technician in the coroner’s office, made very visible to the people who worked there in the 2 days before Andrew’s autopsy was to come out - in a way where the time and place of the poisoning could have been easily determined by a diligent police department but the police department wouldn’t investigate that. AND the autopsy released 2 days after that arsenic poisoning was visible to the coroner... never reported even checking for the signs of the most likely methods by which Andrew could have been assassinated.
I’m not asking you to believe that this was an assassination. In your heart you know what you have to believe, and I respect that. Your reasons are your own, and I don’t question your reasons. All I’m asking is that you refrain from calling people crazy if they believe all these discrepancies and the timing paint a very suspicious picture.
We are dealing with thugs. Andrew had his own company so he was not threatened (which made him and Limbaugh the two chief “rogues” that Soros had to worry about actually reporting the truth on this issue - the very 2 people who had danger or death on the day of Arpaio’s presser), but we have law enforcement confirmation that in October of 2008 the Soros thugs threatened the cable news and talk radio media heads with annihilation if they reported on Obama’s eligibility, and that the media companies passed that threat on to the on-air personalities in the form of threats against their careers and lives if they or any of their guests brought up the issue. We have law enforcement confirmation that at least one of the threatened entities fled the country in fear for her life - and that there were others threatened.
We have statements from a Hillary supporter (who actually spearheaded the petition process) that Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs both died by methods preferred by assassins (”random” shooting and aneurysm) in the 2 weeks before the DNC Convention, shortly (like one day for Gwatney...) after they each in turn agreed to present a petition at the Convention that would allow Hillary to challenge Obama - on votes and on eligibility.
We have the suspicious death of Kam Kuwata, which also remained uninvestigated by Obama’s cherry-picked newly-elected CA AG - after Kuwata began reporting to insiders a bizarre event at the Convention where Obama was in a ritual- or drug-induced trance.
It’s nice to stay above the fray and just talk about ideology, but ideology doesn’t stop the mafia, and that is what we are up against. As long as the “respectable” people among us consider it taboo to call a spade a spade, we will not be able to expose the mafia for what it is or use the methods that have to be used to rescue the country from the grips of the mafia.
You and the other people above the fray do a good job at what you do. It will help this country immensely if you folks also recognize the value of the work being done to expose the mafia that got Obama installed. I have always come at this from a law enforcement perspective. Many, many crimes have been committed. The Cold Case Posse is just beginning to document the long list of crimes committed by the State of Hawaii. The Selective Service Administration, Passport Office, and Social Security Administration should be right behind them in line.
Retired Col Lawrence Sellin overheard a Republican Presidential primary candidate say that eligibility was not being addressed because it goes WAY too deep. They know there is treachery involved beyond a mere birth certificate, and they are afraid of what will happen if that treachery is opened up and exposed. They don’t ignore and/or mock Obama’s eligibility problem because it is so unimportant and unbelievable, but because it is so important and certain.
But I see what you're speaking to now. Yes, it would have been a major fly in the ointment if Hawaii (R)'s in the legislature had rolled over the Dim (I take it) Governor Abercrombie to require Obama to put up his bona fides before putting him on the 2012 Hawaii ballot. Which of course would reflect back on his modus operandi in defending his place on that same ballot in 2008, and Nancy Pelosi's bogus "certification" letter that she sent Hawaii (which was legally null and void, as well as an invasion of Hawaii's state powers).
Another strange occurrence:
Feb. 5, 2012 - Dinner with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers
Mid-Feb - Flu two weeks before death - Autopsy report
March 1, 2012 - Death
Food poisoning not the flu?
Cormier - Arsenic Poisoning
“Bill Ayers: He’s ‘A Sociopath’ But A Great Chef.”
- Andrew Breitbart
Twenty-four days after dinner with Ayers, Andrew has had the flu (???) and died of a heart attack.
Bill Ayers: My dinner with Andrew Breitbart and Tucker Carlson
http://www.bostonreview.net/BR37.2/bill_ayers_tucker_carlson_andrew_breitbart_dinner.php
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/passportgate-a-history/
That’s another comprehensive overview of the passport break-in.
How would they be able to tell he had the flu 2 weeks earlier, in an autopsy? Is that just from the medical record, or was there some kind of test done which showed that? it couldn’t have been from the medical record; the medical record said he hadn’t seen a doctor in the year before he died. There must have been something that tested positive, huh?
It's in the PDF file of the Breitbart autopsy report. Page two of the autopsy PDF file. Sounds like his wife is the source (name redacted).
Investigators narrative
Informant/Witness statements.
SNIP
On 03/01/2012 at about 1015 hours, I conducted a phone interview with (....name redacted...): who related the following; approximately one year ago the decedent was presented into the same ER via ambulance due to shortness of breath. He was diagnosed with congestive heart failure. After a few days he was released for home. He began exercising and dieting. About two weeks ago he had the flu. Recently he was under a lot of stress. He does not smoke and is considered a light drinker. When asked (....name redacted...) denied any drug use by her husband. No further information.
Placemark to your comment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.