“Most of the electorate hasn’t heard of Karl Rove and doesn’t care what he says. Yet, astonishingly, a collection of nitwits can delude themselves into believing that Rove, simply by saying unpleasant things about a candidate, is personally responsible for Akin losing by FIFTEEN points and Christine O’Donnell losing by SEVENTEEN points.”
Do you seriously claim that these large margins of defeat would be eliminated by another republican candidate?
There’s no way such a large deficit could be made up.
What you are actually arguing is that candidates must be vetted by the media.
Most of the electorate hasnt heard of Karl Rove and doesnt care what he says. Yet, astonishingly, a collection of nitwits can delude themselves into believing that Rove, simply by saying unpleasant things about a candidate, is personally responsible for Akin losing by FIFTEEN points and Christine ODonnell losing by SEVENTEEN points.Sarah Steeleman would have won the seat Akin lost.
Do you seriously claim that these large margins of defeat would be eliminated by another republican candidate?
Theres no way such a large deficit could be made up.