[JimRed]

WE NEED A LIST OF THE TRIGGER PULLERS.

That’s what I’ve been saying, stating it as those GIVING THE ORDERS. They need to know (and fear) that they are priority targets. Perhaps a little not-too-covert surveillance of their homes and hangouts would be in order. But I have a problem with targeting their families as well. Adult male relatives, maybe. Wives, kids, nieces and nephews? No. That would make us no better than the terrorists we hate.

But (and a big but) they don’t need to know that their families are not at risk . If they did they’d just use them as human shields, like Muslims do.

[RavenLooneyToon]

The object would not be to target others, but to make them aware they can not take refuge at the homes of relatives.
That they can run but can not hide.
That there will be consequences for any immoral actions they may endeavor.