Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
To argue that a child does not need a mother is to argue against biology itself.
No one comes into this world without the labor of a mother.

You're so right. This Marxist regime is denying human reality.

134 posted on 03/04/2013 12:15:52 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: onyx; Girlene

Anyone that obsessed with arguing with the laws of nature itself is rejecting the Creator, Nature’s God.

How many culture’s have you ever in your life heard of that would argue a child does not need a mother?

Not only is it an aberration in all of human history, but it is twisted. As girlene pointed out, just because some child might have survived with dogs, doesn’t mean dogs are suddenly on a par with the natural family.


136 posted on 03/04/2013 1:18:31 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson