George Zimmerman lawyer: No 'stand your ground' hearing in April [St. Trayvon's Girlfriend Lied]

orlando sentinel ^ | 3/5/13 | Rene Stutzman, Jeff Wiener

[Uncle Chip]

From Witness 8’s BDLR deposition:

BDLR: OK. I’m not saying that they did. I’m just making sure the records’ clear on that….Um…you obviously found out about what happened to Trayvon, right? And at some point you ended up knowing that he was killed, right?

Dee Dee: Yeah.

BDLR: Were you able to go to the funeral or to the wake?

Dee Dee: I was goin’ to go, but…

BDLR: OK, what happened?

Dee Dee: I didn’ feel good.

BDLR: OK, did you end up going to the hospital or somewhere?

Dee Dee: Mmmm…Yeah, I had high blood pressure.

[Bernie putting words in her mouth, making sure to get that on the record, and prompting her to say “Mmmm...Yeah” to his question. And just where did he get the idea that she was in the hospital???]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=V7aVLbKXZnQ

One question:

Is this more evidence that there are two DeeDees??? That BDLR’s 18y/o DeeDee did not go to the hospital, but only claimed she did for the deposition to maintain the charade that she was the earlier DeeDee.

Note how determined BDLR was to get this on the record at her deposition to maintain the charade.

We have multiple lies going on here and the state is part of it. They knew from the start that this was not the first DeeDee and have carried on the charade since day one.

West asked the prosecutor a viable question — When did the state become aware that she had not gone to the hospital. But the prosecutor refused to answer and then he judge intervened to save their rear ends.

[lacrew]

Ok - but would it matter if the charging affidavit stated:

“During this time, Martin was on the phone with a friend and described to her what was happening.....The witness advised that Martin was scared because he was being followed through the complex by an unknown male and didn’t know why.”

Shouldn’t the defense have the right to validate whether or not this conversation happened?

And doesn’t the presence of this statement in the Charging Affidavit presume that the prosecutor has at least validated that a phone call happened? Which would mean that the phone records should already have been ‘released’ by the Martin family and given to the prosecutor.

If not, shouldn’t the judge have slapped down the prosecutor for using unsubstantiated heresay from a 16 y/o girl as a basis for charging?.

And can’t the judge suppress any other phone calls to drug dealers, etc in court? I don’t understand why the possible presence of embarassing information in the records would make the entire record off limits.

It seems simple to me - a very sketchy report from a 18 y/o girl (who was deliberately mis-represented as a 16 y/o girl) was used in the Charging Document! The defense should at least have the right to inspect the phone record and see if this is true.

And...if the prosecutor happens to know that its a false statement, he is supposed to bring that to the attention of the court.

The way things are going, the only evidence allowed will be the NBC re-enactment. For some reason, the media and forces I don’t comprehend want to pin the murder of a black kid on a Latino Democrat, so they can somehow point the finger at white republicans.

[BlueMondaySkipper]

So is it safe to assume that SHE will now be charged with perjury? I mean Shellie Zimmerman was charged, so this woman should be as well. Right?