Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x

Try not to carry threads over into others, if you want to defend Mormonism then go to one of those threads.

Try not to personalize your posts.

Try to respond to what a poster actually said, you probably got your female voting data from my past posts, since when appropriate I post that information, but voting republican or democrat was not what my post was about, it was about their effect on issues, campaigns, political language, even who a party has to choose in physical appearance and demeanor that can be acceptable to female sensitivities.

If you like the effect that female political equality has had on American politics, culture and law, our lost future, and freedom, and advancement, on everything, then you don’t know what has happened to us in the last 90 years, I wonder if you are conservative, if so then you should be able to see that it led to.

Freedom is not what women want, they want material goods, security and comfort, safety, they don’t build civilizations, they just want to live comfortably in one, anyone and don’t really care about what they call themselves, or their ideology, or whether they are free or not, as long as the living is OK.


122 posted on 03/09/2013 10:54:43 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
Men created a system that was to their advantage -- easy divorce, birth control and abortion so that pregnancy wouldn't lead to forced marriages, welfare to deal with abandoned children.

Women resisted that at first. They tended to vote Republican more than men did. They were considered more conservative than men in mid-20th century America. They tended to support religion, marriage, and family more than men did.

Eventually they learned how to use the system to what they thought to be their own advantage and became major supporters. That is pretty standard politics under democratic rule.

There are people who are always looking for some group to blame the current state of things on. Maybe the place to start is by looking in the mirror, as it's usually people not so very different from oneself who had a hand in how things turned out.

Is that "impersonal" enough?

138 posted on 03/09/2013 12:45:11 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson