Do you really think if women didn't have the vote through the 20th century our politics would be that much different?
Maybe there are reasons why people "personalize" arguments with you and make reference to the obsessions you voice on different threads. It looks like you bring the same close-mindedness to every topic you discuss.
Aren't you reading my posts? Of course I do, quit making personal attacks and try and read our posts.
You keep making things up about divorce and social programs for women being something that the men wanted, but you don't seem to understand that females created an entirely new focus for American politics, you can see it today as most of the issues driving American politics are women issues, with an all male electorate they would not even be discussed, much less be the most important issues in America.
It isn't whether they vote democrat or republican, it is what they changed the conversation to, the issues to, the focus to, now soft language, soft issues, and soft men dominate American government and politics, because female voters of either party will recoil at masculine politics and issues.
Blunt, tough talking politicians who wouldn't stand a chance today, tough stances that wouldn't stand a chance today, issues that wouldn't stand a chance today, would do fine if all voters were men, both parties would be totally different, and much farther to the right.