[canuck_conservative]

Perhaps “stable” would have been a better word?

But that's the whole point - there's this pop-psychology meme being spread for the last 40 years that, if women were in charge, there would be no more wars or conflict in the world, just peace, because women "aren't violent", and "care about children".

And I'm calling BS - because women are still human, and subject to the same motives & emotions (greed, covetousness, jealousy, anger, humiliation, etc.) that drive men to conflicts and war.

[bray]

My wife always says if women were in charge they would just nuke everybody and be done with it. She is very wise.

Just like all liberal myths, the truth is likely just the opposite of what they say. If you can kill your own baby, what other bridges are there?

Pray for America

[haffast]

http://bible.cc/genesis/3-16.htm

[dmz]

And I’m calling BS - because women are still human, and subject to the same motives & emotions (greed, covetousness, jealousy, anger, humiliation, etc.) that drive men to conflicts and war.

<><><><><

Absolutely agree, to pretend women are not human and subject to the same stuff as we men are is silly.

However ... I’ll posit that women are less likely to put their babies in harm’s way. Just a thought.

[papertyger]

And I'm calling BS - because women are still human, and subject to the same motives & emotions (greed, covetousness, jealousy, anger, humiliation, etc.) that drive men to conflicts and war.

They are not, however, prone to the same strategies of coercion; thus making them "loose cannons" under our current form of government.