Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Neo-Confederate Myths
March 9, 2013 | vanity

Posted on 03/10/2013 8:19:44 AM PDT by BroJoeK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-905 next last
To: central_va
central_va: "It's your side that is mystery. Why you would spill blood to keep crazy Southerners in this bastard union? That is what needs 'splainin."

That's easy. Whenever your folks declared war on the United States, they brought a big heap of trouble down on their heads.
It wasn't such a smart thing to do.

Funny thing too, because a lot of smart people have done that -- nobody smarter than the Japanese or Germans, and yet they made the same mistake.

Wonder why?

;-)

561 posted on 03/16/2013 11:27:14 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: central_va
It is an innate hatred southerners(broad brush) have of top down control and others "thinking they know what is best".

Which makes their love of that whole slavery thing kind of hard to understand.

562 posted on 03/16/2013 11:28:56 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
The same law, perchance, that inflicted massive duties on Southern exports?

How much were the duties on Southern exports?

563 posted on 03/16/2013 11:30:41 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
JCBreckenridge: "The same law, perchance, that inflicted massive duties on Southern exports?"

Now you're just making stuff up out of nothing.
There were no duties on Southern exports.

Any import tariffs were passed by Congress, which was more often than not controlled by the Southern Slave Power.

564 posted on 03/16/2013 11:32:34 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

Ok, so the Southerners of 1860 are the same as Nazi’s and Japs of 1940 in your mind. Great, stuff your research. GTH.


565 posted on 03/16/2013 11:51:08 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK
But the Confederacy made no approaches to Congress to approve secession or resolve its issues.

You've got to be kidding me. Read the Stupid Goon's second inaugural. He so much admits he turned down peace delegations. The audacious buffoon. Sic Semper Tyrannis.

566 posted on 03/16/2013 11:54:22 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

“Any import tariffs were passed by Congress, which was more often than not controlled by the Southern Slave Power.”

Hohoho, which is why there were protective tariffs for Northern industries. The South was subsidizing Northern industries for a long time. They were getting very tired of it by the time the civil war rolled around.


567 posted on 03/16/2013 1:21:46 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

Did the union pay for the federal property that they stole? No?

Then I don’t see what the problem is with the Confederacy taking over federal buildings in the South.


568 posted on 03/16/2013 1:23:11 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

“But the Confederacy made no approaches to Congress to approve secession or resolve its issues.”

They made plenty of approaches and Lincoln ignored them all. I guess he figured, (correctly at that), that Northerners 150 years later would approve of the expansion of federal power to the benefit of the north in the great ‘war of liberation’.


569 posted on 03/16/2013 1:25:29 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
They were getting very tired of it by the time the civil war rolled around.

Which is why the promised Virginia tariffs as high as they wanted to protect their industries if only they would join the Confederacy.

But I imagine that the anger on import tariffs was nothing compared to this tariff you were talking about on exports. Can you provide more information on that?

570 posted on 03/16/2013 1:28:54 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Did the union pay for the federal property that they stole? No?

They didn't steal anything until the outbreak of the rebellion. Then legislation was passed that allowed the government to seize without compensation any property used to aid the rebel cause. I assume that's what you're talking about when you accuse them of stealing?

Then I don’t see what the problem is with the Confederacy taking over federal buildings in the South.

They didn't belong to them.

571 posted on 03/16/2013 1:31:17 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

And all the federal buildings didn’t belong to the union either, but they took them all the same.


572 posted on 03/16/2013 1:33:36 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; rockrr
Did the union pay for the federal property that they stole? No?

Then I don’t see what the problem is with the Confederacy taking over federal buildings in the South.

That is illogical. Presumably post offices, customs houses, court houses, forts, etc. were already paid for.

Try to avoid stupid tit-for-tat arguments. Not every statement works the same way if it is reversed.

573 posted on 03/16/2013 1:34:27 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
And all the federal buildings didn’t belong to the union either, but they took them all the same.

When? Certainly not in 1860 or 1861. All that property, save a fort or two, was taken by force by the rebels.

574 posted on 03/16/2013 1:36:09 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: x

If it’s ok for the Union to take over federal installations in the North, then it’s perfectly fine for the Confederacy to do so in the South.

The problem is that Lincoln wanted the whole loaf. Which meant war. The Confederacy was satisfied with exercising their right to secession peacefully, but due to Lincoln’s obstinancy, such was not possible.


575 posted on 03/16/2013 1:37:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: x

“When? Certainly not in 1860 or 1861. All that property, save a fort or two, was taken by force by the rebels.

*sigh*.

All the federal installations in the North. Taxes from the South paid for their construction. The south should have either received compensation for what they had paid into, or received control over the federal installations in the South. Either/or. Lincoln wanted all of it so War was inevitable.


576 posted on 03/16/2013 1:39:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
And all the federal buildings didn’t belong to the union either, but they took them all the same.

Yes they did.

577 posted on 03/16/2013 1:41:53 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

Oh, I see. Then all the installations in the South belonged to the Confederacy. :)


578 posted on 03/16/2013 1:43:05 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
All the federal installations in the North. Taxes from the South paid for their construction.

You can just as easily say that all the federal installations in the South were paid for by taxes from the North.

579 posted on 03/16/2013 1:44:00 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O

Which is why the South was owed either compensation for what they did pay or the installations in the South. Either/or.


580 posted on 03/16/2013 1:45:23 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 901-905 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson