So is it your position that under *some* circumstances Virginia *has* the right to unilaterally secede?
(Has not had)
TIA
BroJoeK’s #114 was a bit wordy but the essence is correct - everyone has the natural right to rebellion but there is no “right of secession” enumerated in the United States Constitution, especially not unilaterally.
There is a "right of revolution" when government becomes intolerable, when all lawful recourses have failed, and when serious issues of justice are involved.
But a "right of revolution" does not mean it is "right to revolt" if revolution is doomed to fail.
A failed revolt, as our Founders well knew meant:
So I'll repeat: our Founders gave two acceptable conditions for disunion / secession:
Founders did not approve of unilateral secession "at pleasure", meaning for no serious constitutional reason.
But that was exactly what happened in 1860, and when people talk "secession" today, that's the pattern they refer to.
I say, secession as it happened in 1860 was not Constitutional then, and would not be so today.
Lawful, peaceful secession could be 100% constitutional.