Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teacher317
No one, including the author from what I can tell, is asserting that the Union "do nothing to stop independence" after the illegal secession. It was Lincoln's hope that cooler heads would prevail and the errant states return to the fold.

The fire-eaters however had only war on their minds.

Why wouldn't the Union defend those forts, etc? After all they were the property of the federal US government.

41 posted on 03/10/2013 9:10:46 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr
No one, including the author from what I can tell, is asserting that the Union "do nothing to stop independence"

Do you not read? I copied the quote from the article above. I'll post it again, just to help you out...

In fact, neither out-going President Buchanan nor incoming President Lincoln did anything to stop secessionists from declaring independence and forming a new Confederacy

Look up above. It's Reason #5 up there, and incorporated into 2 other Reasons.

48 posted on 03/10/2013 9:27:30 AM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson