These people are sick and evil.
They should have flatulent folks represented too.. and folks that pick their noses constantly.. if they truly wish to be more ‘true to life’.
There is a reason that Nick and Disney are locked on our home cable system...
They must ‘get them while they’re young’. Honestly, why do these people insist on destroying a child’s innocence? Kids that young don’t think about sex no matter how much the Left wants to foist that perception onto us. If they HAVE heard about sex, they are usually grossed out. LET THE LITTLE CHILDREN HAVE THEIR INNOCENCE! They will be beaten down by life early enough as it is.
Disney owns ABC, and that seems to be the rule on all ABC and Touchstone-produced prime-time comedies.
this is nothing more than conditioning for molesters advocacy. if this were not tv, it would immediatly be called a criminal act and prosecuted.
time for a criminal investigation of the staffers who wold deign to approve this.
One word to change.org: NO!.
Peddle your smut and perverse lifestyle elsewhere. Don’t even think you can hide your predatory instincts and desire to promote pedophilia behind the name of change.org.
Promote pedophilia at your own peril.
This is part of the pro-homosexual propaganda that permeates the media. Children at 4 don't know who they are attracted to. 4 year old boys and girls aren't even attracted to the other sex yet. The deliberate sexualization of children and exposing children to homosexual propaganda is not an accident. It is a plan to create willing young sexual companions to the adult homosexuals who have so much power in the media. It is also a plan to isolate and demonize those who believe in traditional values.
Change.org they are also LIARS. Just another Marxist group trying to destroy the morales of America.
Think about this, Homosexuals make up about 2% of the population. Not ALL homosexuals want to get married, only about 10 to 15% do, so America is suppose to chance thousand of years of history to accommodate between .03% to .02% of the population. Who should determine OUR National Morality the 99.7% or the .03%?
Such a small percentage of the population is gay but they are promoting it everywhere as if it were half. I’ve seen impressionable friends of my kids trying (or claiming) to be gay because they think it’s cool. It’s not ok to mention any opposing values to kids, but it’s mandatory to promote LGBT.
Oh my. Phineas and Ferb?? sigh...I thought I’d found at least one watchable show on tv. :o(
Since only about 2% of the people self-identify as homosexual, they shouldn’t have more than 2% of their characters be gay.
Which means that on a typical show, only 1 out of 50 characters should be gay.
And yet I rarely see a show with more than 10 recurring characters on it where at least one of the characters isn’t gay.
Glee for example, has had at least 6 gay people, although I guess being about glee club, there might be a propensity to have more gays. Degrassi is another show with more gays than you find in the general population.
It’s like they are trying to cement the fiction that 10% of the world is gay.
How many gay congresspeople are there? There may have been 6 so far total. I know gay people, but I bet most of us would find that no more than 1 or 2 people we know are actually gay.
And even when you talk about celebrities, the gay celebrities can almost be named. They are extremely well-known, because they get so much more press. But if you look at a typical movie, and look at all the names on the credits, I bet no more than a couple of the hundred-or-so names are actually gay.
On the other hand, Christians are vastly underrepresented in the media.
These people need to be called out for what they are. Pedophiles. Plain and simple. That’s what you call someone who sexualizes children. Don’t let your kids be preyed upon.
(sarc.) The cynic in me (unfortunately, often very strong), says that since Tranna is often the cause of Liberal or NDP governments both federally and in Ontario, would this petition not mean that, if successful, most of Tranna should get reduced transit fares? Does that mean those in the hinterlands who visit Tranna, would pay more than full fare to subsidize the lefties in Tranna? (/sarc.)
Now, being serious, if you go directly to the link, Reduce Transit Fares for Individuals with an Intellectual Disability, the first comment, by a Mr. Rivers of Tranna, explains the source of many of the problems that Europe, Canada and the US suffer from, "It is a FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENT"! While those with disabilities often receive very limited pensions, and I feel that they should get a break on transit fares to allow some independence and reduce taxpayer costs, I take offense to the many things that many in our society now feel "entitled" to! Reminds me of that line from Dire Straits' Money for Nothing!: "I want my MTV!"
Nick and the Disney Channel were only watchable from the 80s to 1995. After that it became manufactured mush used to sell crap and push agendas.
Nick already had a show on their “Teen Nick” network with a teen lesbian.
Most everyone on Disney these days seems to be pretty gay.
“By not including gay characters, they’re isolating an entire population of children, who look up to people they see on tv.”
Yes, they do look up to people they see on tv, which is exactly why the fag lobby wants a fag character on every show, so that more kids will misguidedly look to them as role models.
Thats right.
Show kids how to be homosexuals so that when they engage in a homosexual lifestyle they can cut 30 years off their lifespan.
Another example that there is no such thing as a “gay agenda” /s