The Supreme Court of the United States refused to stay Judge Land’s $20,000 sanction levied against Orly Taitz for filing a frivolous lawsuit and as I said, the Supreme Court also refused to grant a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in Barnett, Keyes et. al. v Obama. Trying to parse the words of a judicial ruling may be an interesting intellectual exercise for a blog, but the judge’s ruling, personal and/or legal, stands.
The Supreme Court is extremely selective about what it accepts to hear. This says nothing about the quality of Land's decision. There's doubt they would have looked at it that closely. Plus, anything filed by Orly Taitz is a mess to begin with, but that doesn't reconcile the erratic rulings by the courts that can't even agree with each other on the basic legal reasoning.
Trying to parse the words of a judicial ruling may be an interesting intellectual exercise for a blog, but the judge’s ruling, personal and/or legal, stands.
Again, thanks for illustrating circular logic. Plenty of other bad decisions stand unchecked. We hear about them all the time on the rare occasions that people have the resources to go back and retry certain cases. Nobody is forcing you to defend these inconsistent decisions regarding Obama's lack of eligibility.