Leslie Knope is way ahead of you (they were even male penguins, though she didn't know that).
Speaking of ‘rights’ to be argued in front of the laughable Soopreme Kort: who are we to say that cows and other animals don’t desire marriage sanctioned by our socialist government?
Or, on the other hand, why not humans marrying their animals?
Confirming legality on marriages of couples engaged in homosexual coupling is an inherent evil and sinful act in and of itself.
Leslie Knope is way ahead of you (they were even male penguins, though she didn't know that).
An animal does not have the mental capacity to engage in consensual sex with a human. They are driven by instinct, not reason. On the other hand, if sexual preference is the prime concern, then how can one possibly argue against polygamy, polyandry, or any other consensual human grouping? If we’re going to deny reality and say a man’s preference for sodomy is equivalent to heterosexual, aka natural sexual attractions, then let’s be truly fair about it. Any grouping, so long as they are all consenting adults, should be able to declare their eternal love for each other. To do anything else would be to deny equal protection under the law. If preference is it, the key factor, then why should a homo’s preference be given any special protection over a bisexual’s or a guy that wants a harem?
“Or, on the other hand, why not humans marrying their animals?”
They already exist....those who mount animals are called Taxidermists.
And why is marriage restricted to a single person / critter / plant / inanimate object? Maybe some people have enough love for multiple husbands and multiple wives at the same time. These antiquated Victorian Norma have to go. < /lib>