To: cripplecreek
They were somewhat common by the late 1600s, although the population groups here were still tiny and pretty homogeneous.
24 posted on
04/01/2013 3:04:51 PM PDT by
ansel12
(The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
To: ansel12
From wiki for further investigation.
In the United States, until the mid-19th century, common-law marriages were recognized as valid, but thereafter some states began to invalidate common-law marriages. Common-law marriages, if recognized, are valid, notwithstanding the absence of a marriage license. The requirement for a marriage license was used as a mechanism to prohibit whites from marrying blacks, mulattos, Japanese, Chinese, Native Americans, Mongolians, Malays or Filipinos. By the 1920s, 38 states used the mechanism.
25 posted on
04/01/2013 3:07:35 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson