Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoldierDad

Siskel wasn’t really a film buff. He never went to film festivals and never wrote about film outside of his newspaper reviews. If he ever read book on movies it would be news to me. Ebert was a real cinephile and passionate about the artform.


16 posted on 04/04/2013 2:38:22 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

I always liked Ebert because he was the first critic I remember, and still one of the few out there, able to publicly enjoy both high art movies and popcorn silliness. His love of Russ Meyer kept him grounded in everyman films, movies other critics’ egos wouldn’t let them admit enjoying Ebert would be right out front saying “yeah it’s not high art, but you’re going to have fun”. Which is why I always found him to be the better of the two.


22 posted on 04/04/2013 2:43:18 PM PDT by discostu (Not just another moon faced assassin of joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Borges

Since I have never put any stock into critiques of movies, by Eggbert, or anyone else, I really do not care if Eggbert was a cinephile. He was a liberal jack@ss, and that was enough for me to dislike him.


24 posted on 04/04/2013 2:47:55 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson