To: TigerLikesRooster
Yeah, let’s start yet another bombing campaign... with China sitting just to the north, what could go wrong?
As for why the NYT printed it, libs are all for going to war, sibling as there’s a rich political payoff for the little dictator, Colonel Barackamar Obamadaffi.
5 posted on
04/13/2013 2:52:15 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
To: ScottinVA
sibling as = so long as
Damned auto-correct.
6 posted on
04/13/2013 2:53:55 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
To: ScottinVA
Yeah, let’s start yet another bombing campaign... with China sitting just to the north, what could go wrong? Good point; but rest easy, 0bumble will not strike first.
7 posted on
04/13/2013 2:58:01 AM PDT by
luvbach1
(We are finished.)
To: ScottinVA
1.”Colonel Barackamar Obamadaffi” is an instant classic.
2. I hate spitting coffee on my keyboard. Good one!
26 posted on
04/13/2013 6:00:27 AM PDT by
Free in Texas
(Member of the Bitter Clingers Association.)
To: ScottinVA
There are “good” wars and “bad” wars. “Good” wars are the ones we fight when a democrat is in the white house.
To: ScottinVA
Yeah, let’s start yet another bombing campaign... with China sitting just to the north, what could go wrong? Sounds like you're conceding our position in the world to China.
45 posted on
04/13/2013 6:33:59 PM PDT by
tsowellfan
(www.cafenetamerica.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson