Posted on 04/19/2013 10:37:56 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
However in the latest report on WaPo, I noticed the following:
‘Also Friday, the FBI confirmed that its agents in Boston had interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011 at the request of a foreign government. A law enforcement official said the request came from the Russian government, concerned about Tsarnaev’s potential ties to Chechen terrorists. But, after that interview, the FBI did not follow him further, officials said.’
.....which seems to suggest that despite their ages, there were some obvious links - to the Russians, anyway, then missed or just ignored our end. I doubt the Russian government makes requests such as this to the FBI on a routine basis or without some kind of evidence to support it.
More and more, it’s looking like these guys are the Muslim equivalent of James Holmes or the Columbine killers, spree killers with no religious motive, except these Chechens were slightly less indiscriminate.
Yes after their ilk collaborated with the nazis. I guess they danced with the wrong devil (Stalin being the other one) like their brethren the Bosnian Muslims who, while the Orthodox Serbs formed a strong resistance against the Nazis, formed 2 SS divisions to Jihad Nazi style in WW II.
I may be wrong, but my impression is that the Russian mentality is that they will ask for your papers not because you're suspicious, but just because they can make you comply. We get some of that here, but it's pervasive in Russia, in a way that had nothing to do with Bolshevism.
Quite possibly, in Russia. But this was a request made to our FBI, whom they can’t in any way ‘make comply’ - and have no reason to forward such a request to, unless there is a genuine security concern (to themselves, possibly, as much as to us) behind it.
Frickin circus clowns...
Actually it’s looking less and less like that.
On a side-note, while I partially agree with the gist of what you say re Russian mentality of ‘asking for papers because just they can make you comply’ (though that comment isn’t really relevant to what I wrote) - it’s worth mentioning that I spent 3 years living and working in Russia. On not one single occasion (and this includes travelling the entire length of the country from Moscow to Vladivostok both by train, many times, and once by car) was I ever stopped by the police / law enforcement or asked to show my papers or passport, except when entering or exiting the country at an airport or international border.
Nor was this because I’m obviously a ‘foreigner’ in Russia and was treated differently for that reason - I’m not sure anyone could tell I’m not Russian just by looking at me, and I can speak good enough Russian not to need to communicate in English when I’m travelling there.
Not sure I can say the same about the last 3 years I was continuously in the US.... ;)
I have read that folks from the Caucasus get the third degree, and it's clear they (whether Georgian, Ossetian or Chechen) have a distinct look about them, ranging from the unibrow and the 5 o'clock shadow at noon which are visible and the hairy backs, which (generally) isn't.
My impression with religiously-motivated Muslim attacks is that they kill every single person who remotely looks like an infidel. They carjacked some guy and let him walk away. Never mind religious reasons - for operational ones, they had every reason to kill him and stuff his body in the trunk (or bury it somewhere where it wasn't likely to be found any time soon). But they let him live.
The other issue is that a jihadi looking to slaughter infidels would have amassed a much higher body count simply going door-to-door and killing everyone in his path. In Bombay, that's exactly what they did, with 11 guys amassing a body count of 160+ victims.
Quite possibly, and quite possibly with reason, in some instances. But not really connected with the original post - we’re getting a bit off-topic here now :)
>>>Quite possibly, in Russia. But this was a request made to our FBI, whom they can’t in any way ‘make comply’ - and have no reason to forward such a request to, unless there is a genuine security concern (to themselves, possibly, as much as to us) behind it.<<<
FBI is constantly in contact with numerous Russian law-enforcement agencies. They send hundreds of requests to each other.
BTW, under Russian legislation uploading jihadi videos to your social network account might be a federal crime. He also could use social networking for hate preaching or some kind of terror conspiracy which could be tracked as soon as servers are under Russian jurisdiction. They could identify user’s IP as located it United States and that alone was worthy to request FBI to interrogate a perp.
Absolutely agree. My only point was something was identified to trigger this request two years ago. Which obviously (and tragically) wasn’t followed up on or considered serious enough to warrant further investigation.
The carjack victim’s name is Tarek Ahmed. Sounds muslim to me. Sometimes they don’t kill muslims like the Afghans who murdered 10 Christian international humanitarian aid workers / volunteers, but spared their muslim Afghani driver.
Tarek Ahmed, 45, is the "owner" of the gas station where the car jackers released their victim (link):
Tarek Ahmed, 45, told Fox News that the victim, whose Mercedes-Benz was reportedly stolen by Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was a young Caucasian man between 20 and 25 years old. Ahmed claimed that he was working at gas station on Memorial Drive, when the man ran into his store screaming, “Call the police! Call the police! These people are trying to kill me!”"I thought he was drunk. I didn't believe him when he came in, it just sounded very crazy," Ahmed said. Despite his skepticism, Ahmed let the man, who has not been identified, inside to use his phone.
"He came very fast and was nervous and was afraid of the guy. He said they pushed him out of car," he said. "He went inside and closed the door. He was shaking and very nervous. I only believe him when the cops came."
“..going door-to-door and killing everyone ..”
May have been planned different if Bombay had a 2nd amendment though. That method would have brought a quicker end I would think here in the US.
You may be right. The Bombay crew were armed with grenades and fully automatic rifles, though. In any case, I hope we never need to find out.
Overheard on the interwebs:
When one Fox host described the culprits as “punks,” former-senator and current current Fox commentator Scott Brown said, “Not punks—cowards. Cowards.” What is this need to describe terrorists as cowards? Is it supposed to make them feel inadequate? Call them savages, called them maniacal killers; no need to call them cowards. At the same time, the newscasters talk about how Boston residents were “terrorized” and “living in fear for the past few days.” Were they really? I think it’s unseemly to be terrorized by any problem a sidearm should be able to handle. If Bostonians were terrorized, I would apply the term cowards to them.
Of course, for fatuousness, you can always rely on Obama. As he said in his speech yesterday, “Over successive generations, [Boston has] welcomed again and again new arrivals to our shores; immigrants who constantly reinvigorated this city and this commonwealth and our nation.”
[Yes, by all means let’s bring over more wonderful immigrants from places like Chechnya. Who could possibly object?]
And then, “If they sought to intimidate us, to terrorise us, to shake us from those values that Deval described, the values that make us who we are as Americans, well, it should be pretty clear by now that they picked the wrong city to do it. Not here in Boston.”
[Right—Boston, the city that entirely shut itself down for nearly 24 hours to search for two bombers, wasn’t intimidated. And didn’t the CNN correspondents tell us its citizens were terrorized?]
And finally, “But more than that, our fidelity to our way of life, for a free and open society, will only grow stronger, for God has not given us a spirit of fear and timidity, but one of power and love and self-discipline.”
[Meanwhile, stay tuned for a bunch of restrictions on your Constitutional rights I plan to make in reaction to the bombing—no use letting a crisis go to waste.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.