We’ll watch and see. Any libertarians (big L or small) who come to this traitorous Islamic jihadist soldier’s defense have joined the enemy within as far as I’m concerned.
The ones taking that position on FR are more likely to be constitutionalist Oath Keeper types, who fear the possibility of the government abusing the concept of treason in order to use it against patriots.
“Any libertarians (big L or small) who come to this traitorous Islamic jihadist soldier’s defense have joined the enemy within as far as I’m concerned.”
What is your definition of “come to this ...Islamic jihadist...defense? What is your definition of “defense” in that statement? In other words, what would one have to do in your mind to be guilty of coming to this bomber’s defense? I’m asking for clarification because I do not know what you mean.
I personally don’t care what they call him or where they try him as long as his death is the end result. I have said they need to rip off his legs so he will know how that feels before he is killed.