The Glenn Beck Program, Monday, Apr 22, 2013

www.glennbeck.com/content/radio ^ | Apr 22, 2013 | Glenn Beck

[thouworm]

Fox News just pulled this story. I still have it in cache.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3010867/posts

[Fresh Wind]

Surprise, surprise, surprise.

[chris37]

Yes it is. All over the place.

[concerned about politics]

Fox News just pulled this story.

Why? Beck has the documents to prove it. Even senators know about this. This story is big.
Why a cover up by the media?

Wouldn't it be great if theres a coup of patriots ready to nail oboma for treason? (Probanly not, but I can dream)

[chris37]

Oh hmm, I am not familiar with that movie, I will have to look into this.

[Fresh Wind]

Found a summary of 212(a) here:

http://www.cavanaughlegal.com/waiver-immigration/inadmissibility-waiver/212-a-inadmissibility-grounds-waiver-of-inadmissibility/

[cuban leaf]

I consider it a classic. Think of it as a comedy version of 1984, but only kinda sorta. Believe it or not, Robert DeNero is in it and plays a hilarious tongue in cheek part.

[Yosemitest]

Read what God says.
Didn't our Heavenly Father, through our Savior tell us...

" thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother."

How well we deserve this curse (~so shall the LORD bring upon you all evil things~) God has given us,
through the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF, the FASCIST Obama.

Someone once ask, "When is violence for political purposes justified?"...

Thomas Jefferson once said that,
"When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
So, in light of the minor outbreaks of violence we've been seeing lately, I ask
when is it justified?
We have a second amendment to help protect us from the government,
when is it acceptable to take up arms?
At what point does violence become the correct response?

I recommend the following for your valuable time, to ponder... (all 37 pages)

Violence, Nonviolence, and the American Revolution

All things written in the Bible must come to pass,
and we WILL get to the day worse than has ever been.

And this too shall pass...

They hate him that rebuketh in the gate,
and they abhor him that speaketh uprightly.
Forasmuch therefore as your treading is upon the poor,
and ye take from him burdens of wheat:
ye have built houses of hewn stone,
but ye shall not dwell in them;
ye have planted pleasant vineyards,
but ye shall not drink wine of them.
For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins:
they afflict the just,
they take a bribe,
and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.

Can you remember reading about "a thorn in their side"?

"But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you;
then it shall come to pass,
that those which ye let remain of them
shall be pricks in your eyes,
and thorns in your sides,
and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.
Moreover
it shall come to pass,
that I shall do unto you,
as I thought to do unto them."

The command I await is...

"Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them".

[thouworm]

Anyone? One last question to get up to speed.

Beck referred to 2 OTHER Saudis connected with the Saudi National? but I missed his earlier references.

Where do they come in? Does anyone have a link about them? their names?

[Fresh Wind]

212(d)(3) Non-immigrant waivers:

http://mikebakerlaw.com/blog/2012/12/06/non-immigrant-waivers/

This is how a terrorist can get into the country. It would appear that Saudis have a blanket waiver under this section.

[Armando Guerra]

INA: ACT 212 [8 U.S.C. 1182] - GENERAL CLASSES OF ALIENS INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE VISAS AND INELIGIBLE FOR ADMISSION; WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILLITY

Sec. 212(a) Classes of Aliens Ineligible for Visas or Admission.-Except as otherwise provided in this Act, aliens who are inadmissible under the following paragraphs are ineligible to receive visas and ineligible to be admitted to the United States:

(3) Security and related grounds.-

(B) Terrorist activities-

(i) 3/ 4/ 4a/ IN GENERAL.-Any alien who-

(I) has engaged in a terrorist activity,

(II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv));

(III) has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;

(IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of--

(aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or

(bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity;

(V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi);

(VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;

(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;

(VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or

(IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years, is inadmissible.

[concerned about politics]

The BIG news - a revelation - today is suppose to come at 5:00?
How much bigger can it get???

[thouworm]

Thanks Fresh Wind! That’s a keeper.

Posting your links in one place for future reference. This isn’t the last time we will need these.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
~~~~~~~~~

Found a summary of 212(a) here:

http://www.cavanaughlegal.com/waiver-immigration/inadmissibility-waiver/212-a-inadmissibility-grounds-waiver-of-inadmissibility/
~~~~~~~~~~

212(d)(3) Non-immigrant waivers:

http://mikebakerlaw.com/blog/2012/12/06/non-immigrant-waivers/

This is how a terrorist can get into the country. It would appear that Saudis have a blanket waiver under this section.

[opentalk]

State department has been pushing a pro Muslim Brotherhood agenda...sends massive amounts of aid

Also disturbing Kagan accepted Saudi funds for Islam studies program, while Dean at Harvard, now supreme court judge.

[MomwithHope]

I thinkt the Saudis are part owners of FoxNews

[thouworm]

“I think the Saudis are part owners of FoxNews.”

They are. I think they own 18-20% of Fox.

[thouworm]

Re: the pulled Fox article

kristinn and crosslink just posted these links:

Complete Todd Starnes Fox Radio report still up at Townhall for now...
http://townhall.com/columnists/toddstarnes/2013/04/22/saudi-national-questioned-in-boston-attack-was-on-terror-watch-list-n1574863/page/full/

http://news.yahoo.com/beck-breaks-exclusive-information-saudi-national-allegedly-connected-144627335.html;_ylt=A2KJ2Ug4UnVRHiEA_4XQtDMD

[MachIV]

Thanks. I’m confused on this other than it looks like Saudis have dirt on Obama......Obama moves to hide this dude. It looks dastardly.

[penelopesire]

Thank you for the link. I will be dropping in and out today so please keep me pinged to anything you think important. I appreciate it!!

Got Glenn Beck playing on my phone non stop and will be listening to his 5:00 show. Wow just wow....please everyone....call you senators and congress critters. We have to demand answers.

[Yosemitest]

There were a lot more of these photos posted on Frtee Republic that day, April 18 2013 that need to be reviewed.

Does this guy Bada look like the guy standing next to the guy that looks much like suspect #2? Bada is the flatmate of the Saudi kid.