unarmed when they found him does not mean unarmed the whole previous day.
I sometimes like reading Leftist sites, because they do come up with things that I would never think of, that are sometimes at least interesting, but this one fails. He could easily have had a gun during the shootout when his brother was killed and then not have it when, seriously wounded, he crawled into his hiding place.
I haven’t forgotten that little episode of him of setting a bomb down next to a little boy and walking away.
He’s lucky the people didn’t get their hands on him.
I was at a restaurant in Chicago tonight that had communal seating and there was a major nutjob truther ranting to his friends across from me about how all of this was a CIA false flag and connected to 9/11.
No, but “unarmed when they found him” means there was no need to kill the boat! Which now looks like swiss cheese. This makes the cops look worse. As do the pictures from the shootout scene showing he was able to escape because they didn’t have the road blocked. I thought only hollywood perps were able to escape that way. Who’s going to make the movie? Iran? The Palis? Egypt? One of the Stans? The Turks are too two faced to try it. Maybe Libya will; they’ve proven they can get away with anything. They hardly need a scriptwriter, although they might delay starting production hoping for a couple more good scenes.
yeah...while wounded and being hunted down like a dog, he got rid of the gun ‘cause he didn’t need it anymore.
Afterward, the Police Chief reported that it was a shootout at the boat scene....and he KNEW the kid had no weapons, but that’s not important?