Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

Neah. Still need to make sure they’re actually guilty and not scapegoats.
But the Chechen scumbag has confessed, so, in a sane world, the prosecution would call two witnesses ask “Did the accused say this?” then turn it over to the Defense - and the Judge should tell the Defense to keep it short - the jury doesn’t to work the whole day on this...


35 posted on 04/29/2013 10:07:24 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray

One important thing to understand it that he wasn’t going to be denied rights. Miranda only means that he must be informed of his rights.

Kinda funny that in 1895 the supreme court ruled that jurors need not be informed of their rights but the later Miranda ruling says that the accused must be informed.

Frankly I think better education is the real answer to this conundrum.


36 posted on 04/29/2013 10:15:48 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson