You would rather vote for a pro-life Dem over a pro-life libertarian.
This says a lot about you...
None of it good.
I seem to recall suggesting that your failure to accurately fact-check the points you chose to respond to was due to either laziness or stupidity. Since your dedication to this conversation is obvious, I will now conclude that that failure can only be due to stupidity.
Here, again, is the full statement that you were responding to:
While I agree that any so-called "pro-choice republican" is almost certainly going to lean libertarian, I clearly never used the word "libertarian" in my statement. And I definitely did not use the term "pro-life libertarian." We have already seen that such an animal does not exist.
That is four times that you have incorrectly addressed that statement and I have called attention to your stupidity/laziness/poor reading comprehension. What I find particularly amusing about your difficulty here is that I can remember writing that post five days ago and wondering if you would be stupid enough to key on it. I had intended it as a throwaway, but I included the "honest" and the "(if such a thing existed)" just to have a little fun. I confess to overestimating your intelligence, because I had no idea at the time that it would pay off such dividends. I stand by what I wrote, but I admit that I have been voting now for two decades and I have yet to come across such a democrat.
That being said, the lives of 25 million unborn children have been legally ended in that period. There can be no political cause more important than that.