Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pascal Robert: Why Obama Will Walk Away Unscathed by the Current Political Scandals
Your Black World ^ | 05/17/2013 | Pascal Robert

Posted on 05/17/2013 1:09:31 PM PDT by aimhigh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: don-o

Franklin’s advisement for protesting thugs is one of my favorite ways to show public disgust with tyrants.

Sharing an elevator with such cretins several hours after some boiled eggs, pickled cabbage, canned chili with Pepperjack cheese and a Schlitz Tall Boy would be a great first salvo of sharing our discontent with the REAL arseholes of this post-Constitutional society.


61 posted on 05/17/2013 6:59:41 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I don’t think Barry will walk away. He ain’t no Billy Jeff.


62 posted on 05/17/2013 7:07:57 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor
Well, then I suggest you keep cheering for Obozo to beat the rap so you can enforce your "rightness" complex.

I assume you're one of these 'see, hear and speak no evil unless it's smooth and easy things' types of personalities.

I'm not cheering for His Heinous to escape his crimes and complicity in all these scandals and treason. The fact I point out FACT of the current reality situation, is not cheering - but warning. Hell, Limbaugh and Levin THIS WEEK said the same damn thing I did - WARNING everyone not to get hopeful for any of this to stick to Obama - because none of this is going to in the long-run.

This was a multi-pronged and calculated release of information BY the regime itself and his media. Now they can say with a straight face that they are not in the tank for Obama and are objective in their reporting. Meanwhile, Obama is at another fundraiser and his lackeys are wanting Obama to get more confrontational.

That, by the way, is a complex where you INSIST that you are "RIGHT" and will argue YOUR POV until others concede.

Maybe Conservatives and Christians ought to have done a bit more of that over the last few decades or so. I bet we would't be in this mess if they did. I mean, Liberal Socialists will argue their POV until their opposition concedes or they get it installed as law and policy.

The ONLY drawback to that is when you discover, some time later down the road, that you were NOT "RIGHT" and things weren't as you thought.

History is a great teacher and often mirrors and repeats itself when a people forget it or are willfully ignorant of it. That said - there are no fortune tellers and God has not spoken to any prophet about what is going to happen next week - so we do as we always do - see through a glass darkly.

I previously stated that you would see things unravel within 30 days. You could not tell me "we shall see.' Instead you INSIST I DO NOT understand the depth of things. You're INSISTING you're "RIGHT" and I'm not.

No. I'm saying - don't get your hopes up - because I don't think your definition of 'unraveling' and mine are the same. I don't see anything happening to Obama or his cabinet heads over any scandal we currently know about.

I'd love to be wrong - but I've watched way too many people get their hopes up only to see them dashed, and these folks have quit the fight as a result. They're done, finished and frightened - going Galt because they can't handle being continually disappointed, and now there's a real palpable fear among them.

It's not a matter of wanting to be right for my own satisfaction - it's insisting people consider the very real truth of what is the most likely outcome of all this, so they are still functional and ready to take it to the next level in this fight.

Sadly I am really beginning to fear, not many of us are up to it. This people do not want to hear the worst so they can prepare for it. They only want to imagine the best.

Patrick Henry would disagree with such a mindset. In fact, he even gave a sermon on that score.

63 posted on 05/17/2013 7:25:49 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

After Benghazi, there is one too many skeletons in Hillary’s closet. MSM won’t be able to protect her. There is nothing you or I can do to stop her from running anyways.

I am more concerned about gov. O’Malley of Maryland. He seems to be very clever in debates.


64 posted on 05/17/2013 7:36:04 PM PDT by entropy12 (Even tho Obama is now a lame duck, with 2014 House majority, he will be a dangerously socialist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

Its very dangerous to try to clue freepers in on reality.


65 posted on 05/17/2013 7:48:39 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I agree with INVAR.

The truth is too hard to swallow...


66 posted on 05/17/2013 9:05:24 PM PDT by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
and when he farts, the msm’s cheeks bulge.

That's pretty good.

Disgusting, yes, but still pretty good.

67 posted on 05/17/2013 9:08:36 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks

Awesome!


68 posted on 05/17/2013 9:12:00 PM PDT by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better (I AM ANDREW BREITBART)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Pretty sure he can’t be removed by Congress as he serves at the pleasure of the President and the Senate approved him.

He can be removed via impeachment (but removal requires two thirds of the Senate).

William Belknap, who was Secretary of War under Ulysses S. Grant, is the only cabinet officer to have been impeached. He resigned upon being impeached. The Senate went ahead with a trial anyway, but Belknap was acquitted (removal would have meant disqualification for future federal office). There had been debate in the Senate over whether it had jurisdiction, given his resignation. It is thought some of the senators voting for acquittal did so because they believed they lacked jurisdiction, not because they didn't think he deserved removal.

69 posted on 05/17/2013 9:48:40 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey; Private_Sector_Does_It_Better

We only report the facts :o)

Sometimes, they report back.


70 posted on 05/17/2013 10:06:49 PM PDT by glock rocks ("If not us, who? If not now, when?" - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

I still strongly suggest you see a therapist about getting past your “RIGHTNESS” complex.


71 posted on 05/18/2013 10:11:11 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson