I wouldn’t claim she broke the law by what she did.
I do think she breached a technicality that invalidates her ability to claim the 5th.
You can’t just testify about the parts you want to. If you testify at all, you open yourself up to being required to testify about everything.
I think we might need a lawyer to weigh in on this point.My sense is that,when under oath,you can pick and choose which questions you're willing to answer and on which ones you'll take the 5th.