Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved (in Texas)
KHOU ^ | 5/25/2013 | MICHAEL BRICK

Posted on 05/26/2013 7:30:56 AM PDT by GraceG

Edited on 05/26/2013 7:33:47 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.


(Excerpt) Read more at khou.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: drugs; drugscreening; drugtesting; texas; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/26/2013 7:30:56 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GraceG

“Democrats have blocked a separate measure that would have required drug testing for welfare recipients. “

Of course they have, haven’t they...

If you get government money, you are a defacto government employee, you should at least be held to somewhat of a standard in my opinion.


2 posted on 05/26/2013 7:32:04 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

3 posted on 05/26/2013 7:45:40 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

My ex wife is on disability precisely because of her drug & alcohol addiction.


4 posted on 05/26/2013 7:46:14 AM PDT by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
I have no problem with this, except for the lack of drug testing for the entire Congress, starting with Nancy Pelosi. Do that, and I'm in.

Oh, yeah, the entire Congress must accept O'Bammmy care for their own coverage.

FMCDH(BITS)

5 posted on 05/26/2013 7:50:10 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Unemployment ‘benefits’ are insurance which is purchased to protect an employee in the case of job loss. If eligibility is contingent upon some condition, the test should come at application not redemption. Imagine paying for home owners insurance for decades only to learn that you are ineligible to collect after your house burns down — for a reason that was not disclosed until after your home burned.

Furthermore, ineligible employees should be paid/reimbursed the cost of insurance. I’m sure there are plenty of private insurers who will provide coverage.

I find it completely ironic that employees are penalized for recreational drug abuse while welfare beneficiaries are not tested for drug abuse. The former has at least contributed to our GDP.

In a society that decriminalizes, legalizes, and subsidizes drug abuse, it is immoral to deny someone unemployment benefits based on a test conducted at the time of benefit payment. No private firm could conduct a scam like this.


6 posted on 05/26/2013 7:50:11 AM PDT by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

WHAT???

So, the people who have actually been working and who fail a drug test will not be able to receive unemployment insurance and the welfare recipients whose welfare these formerly employed people helped pay for will continue to receive welfare, drugs or not?

Well, the obvious solution is for these former workers to apply for welfare.


7 posted on 05/26/2013 7:51:20 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizwor

“Unemployment ‘benefits’ are insurance which is purchased to protect an employee in the case of job loss.”

The EMPLOYER pays both state and federal for unemployed compensation. The employee does not.

The “ application” is when the former employee applies for unemployment benefits and that is when a drug test may be administered.


8 posted on 05/26/2013 7:57:20 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wizwor
Imagine paying for home owners insurance for decades only to learn that you are ineligible to collect after your house burns down — for a reason that was not disclosed until after your home burned.

Burn you own house down and try to collect the insurance. It's the same with unemployment insurance. If you cause the job loss, you aren't entitled to collect.

9 posted on 05/26/2013 8:07:23 AM PDT by aimhigh (Guns do not kill people. Abortion kills people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wizwor; RWGinger

As an small business employer, I pay those unemployment insurance benefits, not the employee. I would like to be reimbursed when an ex-employee fails drug testing.


10 posted on 05/26/2013 8:10:26 AM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Read your policy — it’s in there.


11 posted on 05/26/2013 8:10:57 AM PDT by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

that’s part of the compensation package


12 posted on 05/26/2013 8:11:33 AM PDT by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Drug testing not a bad idea....but the cost is just too much. A good accurate drug test runs at least $150. Any cheaper...and you spend more $$ challenging false tests in court.


13 posted on 05/26/2013 8:11:57 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizwor

Imagine paying for home owners insurance for decades only to learn that you are ineligible to collect after your house burns down — for a reason that was not disclosed until after your home burned.

Try conducting illegal activities from your home, have a fire and then try to collect. Its in the fine print.

Wish insurance companies would do the same if someone is texting and has a wreck.... pay liability for other’s damages, but “texters” car not covered.


14 posted on 05/26/2013 8:17:02 AM PDT by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Kind of unfair to people who HAD a job, but lost their job.
But they let the Welfare folks off the hook?


15 posted on 05/26/2013 8:20:10 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wizwor

Wrong, its part of cost of conducting business.

If it was compensation, you’d be paying tax on it.


16 posted on 05/26/2013 8:20:18 AM PDT by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

The dems think welfare collectors vote dem more.

Sometimes steps are better take small, even in Texas. Next comes testing for welfare. Watch em run to Nuevo York. Happy, happy, happy.


17 posted on 05/26/2013 8:24:35 AM PDT by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

18 posted on 05/26/2013 8:29:50 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

I’m all for drug testing — I work in the aerospace industry and am routinely tested. That is not the point.


19 posted on 05/26/2013 8:34:57 AM PDT by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vietvet67

Does the newly unemployed only have to test once, or subject to ongoing random?


20 posted on 05/26/2013 8:43:19 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson