Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head

Did the leadership not anticipate a backlash? Did they not care? Stunning!


3 posted on 06/04/2013 8:30:49 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: servantboy777
Did the leadership not anticipate a backlash? Did they not care?

They are now ruled by sodomites. And the goal of the sodomites is to tear down every conservative organization. They WANT the scouts to fail.

5 posted on 06/04/2013 8:41:50 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: servantboy777
3 Did the leadership not anticipate a backlash? Did they not care? Stunning!

Of course they expected a backlash.

4/19/2013 - The BSA’s National Executive Committee (~23 voting members) unanimously approved and released its membership standards resolution, which proposed removing the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone and maintaining the current membership policy for all adult leaders of the BSA. Under the new proposal, there is a national standard and no “local option.”

http://scoutingmagazine.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/executive-summary-of-study-findings.pdf

Key Findings - excerpts

 51% of major donors support the current policy while 33% oppose it. But a majority of Fortune 500 companies want to see the policy changed.

 The summary of findings said a policy change would cost the Scouts a minimum of 100,000 to 350,000 (13.5%) members. “It is believed any gain in membership because of a change to the membership policy related to youth and adults would be in the range of 10,000 to 20,000 (<1%) youth.”

41 posted on 06/04/2013 2:00:21 PM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson