[butterdezillion]

Seems like this would be a good reason for any store owner with integrity to simply refuse to carry the “product”.

Or for anybody with a brain. Who wants to be subject to a lawsuit when some 8-year-old dies of complications from a drug your store sold her?

[reg45]

Require that underage recipients have a release of liability signed by their parents.

[Wanderer99]

Or for anybody with a brain. Who wants to be subject to a lawsuit when some 8-year-old dies of complications from a drug your store sold her?

Dead 8 year olds are good for the planet doncha know...

[precisionshootist]

"Seems like this would be a good reason for any store owner with integrity to simply refuse to carry the “product”."

This was my first thought also. Who the heck would be dumb enough to even carry this product for sale? Any major grocery store chain or even pharmacy would be nuts to have it on the shelf.

This I think will be the lefts unintended consequences. Soon You won't be able to find these pills for sale no matter how old you are.

When they first said age "15" my thought was the same. What store would carry it because how could a 15 year old prove they were 15 and legal to buy and not 14 or 13? They don't have a drivers license or ID. The obvious answer was the store would not risk carrying the product in the first place.