Why I Don't Care About Edward Snowden

National Journal ^ | June 12, 2013 | Ron Fournier

[B4Ranch]

“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion...
Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
John Adams:

WHAT IS A PATRIOT?

PATRIOTS are not "Revolutionaries" trying to overthrow the government of the United States.

PATRIOTS are "Counter-Revolutionaries" trying to prevent the government of the United States,
from overthrowing the Constitution of the United States. - Unknown Author

[metafugitive]

The police state has to care about Edward Snowden.

The boys and girls got no choice in the matter.

They gotta trust the 29 year old high school dropouts of the world.

They have grown the police state beyond the capacity of the public school system to educate as well as indoctrinate the mechanics necessary to fill up the Utah desert with metadata.

Edward Snowden is a dangerous man to any police state because he appears to be a fellow that thinks for himself. He read the Fourth Amendment for himself and is in no need of pontificating law professors like George W Obama or military lawyers like Goober Graham to explain the Bill of Rights to him.

The defenders of the police state are jokes.

They call Edward a narcissist. In the modern world a narcissist is anyone who opens a Twitter or Facebook account and voluntarily seeks attention by disclosing personal information about themselves to the entire world. The Tsarnaev brothers were narcissists, not Edward.

The Fox News Channel is owned by some media mogul who was wiretapping innocents in the U K not on the grounds of national security but for nothing more than filthy lucre. It comes as no surprise that they got the likes of Karl Rove telling the masses to trust the police state whether it is operated by Barry H Bush or George W Obama.

It is much more fun to watch MSNBC. Lawrence O'Donnell is the tank and Barry can do no wrong.

But give Rachel Madcow some credit. She is showing a bit of resistance. She had a great piece the other night where she told how the Chinese had officially protested a letter McCain had written in support of Taiwan, but the letter was still in the McCain campaign computer system and had never been sent.

For clowns like Peter King to claim how Snowden had compromised our national security to our enemies is laughable.

The Chinese don't need twenty-nine year old high school dropouts to compromise our computer networks, in Red China working for the police state is a profession and their mechanics have been educated and indoctrinated and are too damned scared to ever a utter a breath of what they know.

Red China is a real police state. This is only a wannabe police state trying to get by on unindoctrinated twenty-nine year old dropouts who will not sell their soul for six-figure incomes in exotic locales.

[Just mythoughts]

OK .... I read your post. I know what ‘red china’ is. But that did not stop the Clintons from shall we say exchanging ‘intel’ with them for campaign contributions. I do not get this aghast against ‘red China’ now given how much debt this same nation has taken on for/from US.

I think compartmentalization is taking place regarding where this guy decided to flee. I think ‘red China’ has more real time intel on US than we Americans have a clue exists. Same applies for Russia or any other nation that send representatives to the UN.

Governments are global and the majority of US have no clue the exchanges made behind ‘secret’ doors. Given the willingness of Republicans to amass US into debt to children yet not born, I hold no illusion there is much difference in the two political parties.