Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: If the GOP is this stupid, it deserves to die
Human Events ^ | 6/12/2013 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 06/12/2013 6:42:51 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: sickoflibs

And no, Republicans are not going along with this because they want to lose their own elections. That one is not worth debating. Its mainly #1 and/or #2


Rubio & Ryan are making selfish personal political calculations. They are arsonists trying to shore up personal power bases to keep their gravy coming in while the GOP burns down. Then in 2020 or 2024 they will run for POTUS. None of the first team GOPe will run in 2016. They want nothing to do with engaging the Dems right now.


61 posted on 06/12/2013 9:20:14 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
10 percent more blacks voted in 2012 compared to 2008

Given recent revelations about NSA, I'm not so sure about this anymore. Register those who aren't registered, vote for those that don't vote, if you get caught they won't object. I would think a larger number would turn out for the first, historic election than for re-election.

62 posted on 06/12/2013 9:22:08 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Ann Coulter must be evaluated one issue at a time. I do the same thing with Pat Buchanen. (And now, apparently, Rand Paul.)

I agree completely. Ann is usually right about the issues - - she just has horrible taste in men. It will take a long, LONG time for her to shake her embarrassing, if brief, Pork Porkie infatuation, as well as her duplicitous spin in support of Mittens. I hope she has plenty of time, but I think she is going to give it a go.

Her columns are still worth reading.

63 posted on 06/12/2013 9:37:07 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
Yep. They’re not the stupid party for nothing. After all, whatcha gonna do? Vote Democrat? /sigh

No, but you can do what I did last November - - vote for conservatives in races that have a conservative on the ticket and don't vote in races that don't have a conservative on the ticket. (shrug) Easy.

64 posted on 06/12/2013 9:42:53 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Put an end to this stupid party and let the replacement arise from the ashes like a PHOENIX. SOON.


65 posted on 06/12/2013 10:10:32 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Coulter is making sense again which means she must be getting serviced regularly.


66 posted on 06/12/2013 10:33:18 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Ann has been right (correct) on most opinions.

She has a few outliers of course (Christie, for example), but she's usually correct, and unafraid to challenge the GOP stupids.

Ann is our ally on the uber important worries of amnesty for illegal aliens and gun confiscation, and she better at summarizing complex situations than most (if not all) on Capitol Hill.

.

67 posted on 06/12/2013 10:35:50 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"Ann Coulter must be evaluated one issue at a time. I do the same thing with Pat Buchanen. (And now, apparently, Rand Paul.)"

Ditto. Add in Rubio. Sad.

My love for Reagan grows every year - after dealing with wave after wave of GOP-e and RINO idiots.

My disappointment over Ted Cruz's POTUS eligibility grows in direct proportion to my disappointment with Rubio's immigration policy disclosures. :-(

68 posted on 06/12/2013 10:44:11 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Yes, she’s back on track with this one. But her support for gay activists (GOProud) and then Mitt Romney pretty well finished her off as someone who can be counted on.

Well said.

69 posted on 06/12/2013 11:03:53 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

She’s a Bipolar Pundit. She is either out of her mind in liberal fantasy or on her conservative meds. This bit of commentary is when she is at her best with all the facts at her fingertips.

Good work here Ann. But next time you feel a liberal episode about to be triggered, lock yourself in your room and force yourself to look at a photo of Michael Moron’s Butt Crack for about two hours until the episode passes; then take a shower.


70 posted on 06/13/2013 12:00:44 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Republicans? They are stuck on stupid. Always tilting at windmills instead of going after what really matters.... less government and more individual freedoms.


71 posted on 06/13/2013 12:37:31 AM PDT by MovementConservative (Go Mariners! 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

So it’s safe to conclude that the Republican Party will soon fall apart. What should conservatives do to adapt? Perhaps consider these options:

A.) Form a Third Party (But too costly, time-consuming and could take decades before and if we become a formidable political party)

B.) Join the Democrat Party and form the conservative wing. At least this would give Barry and Hildabeast a few headaches.

C.) Do a Karl Rove-in-reverse. Hire ourselves out as Democrat political operatives and sabotage all their schemes. If Karl Rove could single-handedly destroy the GOP, I’m sure there a few Freepers smart enough to do the same to the Democrat Party.

So what’s the best option?


72 posted on 06/13/2013 12:46:52 AM PDT by TexGrill (Don't mess with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Impy; stephenjohnbanker
The two arguments regarding the GOPs motives for supporting this are : 1) because they believe that this will help them in elections regarding Hispanics and 2) That they were bought off by business (SJB main point) There is truth to both of them.

I agree with you, but not with R buffoons (#1) that this will help them in elections apart from money from fat cats.

73 posted on 06/13/2013 1:05:44 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill
My suggestions for the national GOP?

1. Don't let the crazies and sleazy become the face of the party.(Donald Trump, Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, et al.) Conversely, promote Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and other intelligent, dynamic pols as the face of the party.

2. Focus on individual liberties and limiting government in citizens lives.

3. Leave the states to figure out how to govern themselves. Cut the Federal gov and return local control.

TexGrill, as long as there are places in the Republican Party where people get together and talk about "legitimate rape", the GOP will be seen as the intrusive and loony party. Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock found receptive audiences in some GOP circles for their ideas. Until the loons are told to hit the road, boils like those two and Trump will continue to pop up.

74 posted on 06/13/2013 1:08:14 AM PDT by MovementConservative (Go Mariners! 2014!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

Marco Rubio? Really? I understand what you say about Todd Akin, but supporting the Leftist Marco Rubio isn’t a good idea either. How come you never mentioned Sen. Ted Cruz as someone to endorse?


75 posted on 06/13/2013 1:11:57 AM PDT by TexGrill (Don't mess with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill

Only a liberal would come up with such a lousy list of candidates. Pay no mind.


76 posted on 06/13/2013 1:25:06 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Put an end to this stupid party and let the replacement arise from the ashes like a PHOENIX. SOON.

The problem at its core, is the stupidity of conservatives who continue to nominate and vote for the stupid Republicans.

If conservatives fall for the McCains, Bushes, and Romneys year after year what is going to magically make them change if you repackage the same voters under a different label?

77 posted on 06/13/2013 2:41:02 AM PDT by ClaytonP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Coulter’s candidate lost not because of little old Black ladies, but because Romney sucked as a condidate and couldn’t excite the conservative base.

...hate to break it to you and to your cohorts, but any candidate who would excite you would’ve garnered 191 EV’s, compared to Romney’s 206, probably losing North Carolina in the process...what makes you think otherwise? Who would’ve exceeded that amount? Palin? Gingrich?
...Republicans weren’t going to win in 2012 in any scenario, and Romney did as well, with good showings in Ohio and Florida, as could be expected...conservative voters are already the most reliable poll goers, and thinking some mythical ultra conservative candidate is going to excite millions of additional conservative voters (which is precisely what would’ve been required) is delusional...


78 posted on 06/13/2013 3:37:42 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: manc
Why don’t Democrats waste their time trying to win the votes of gun owners?

Anyone notice Chris Wallace never looks soulful while asking dems what they'll do about NOT have the white male vote, or the gun owners vote, or the traditional Christian vote. NEVER. The GOP is so stupid they listen to their enemies (dems) give them advice.

If the GOP wants to survive they need to make strong appeals to the people who support them...

79 posted on 06/13/2013 5:34:45 AM PDT by GOPJ (Why donÂ’t Democrats waste their time trying to win the votes of gun owners? - Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Hate to break it to you but Romney would have back-benched the conservative movement whereas Obama unites and strengthens it by providing a target-rich environment.

It’s called the give and sway of the electorate of independents that decides the elections. Just look at the South once a bastion of Democrat politics now a swamp to the progressive minded.

To win a war one must first defeat the opposition within before focusing on the enemy outside. The US Army Brass during WWII spent more time fighting each other politically in the first two years of that war than they did focusing on the enemy. Same thing under Lincoln with the Army of the Potomac under McClellan.

And of course the same pattern with Rockefeller Republicans against Ronald Reagan.

History repeats.

Romney, Rove, Bush Family, etc. need to step aside....soon they will have no choice.


80 posted on 06/13/2013 5:39:42 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson