Skip to comments.Sarah Palin rejoining FOXNEWS as contributor, DRUDGE has learned, announcement expected this aft.
Posted on 06/13/2013 10:24:41 AM PDT by plewis1250
Sarah Palin rejoining FOXNEWS as contributor, DRUDGE has learned, announcement expected this afternoon... Developing...
Okay, so you’re playing the “Support Amnesty for Illegals or you’re not a Christian” card?
From your own post..
” “From there, then, once that is taken care of, we can deal with those who are here illegally and we can figure out all that immigration reform that needs to take place. “
We don’t need “immigration reform”, and any reform is amnesty.
She is parsing, just as before.
Good job and well said. I suspect that threats have been made to pivotal conservatives surely as bribes have been promised to representatives (both Democrat and Republican) to insure this travesty amnesty is passed.
A Palin/Cruz ticket, IMHO, would trounce Hillary come 2016 as the bill comes due on Obamacare while the economy continues to founder. These two conservatives reach into the hearts of anyone who still has one - the conservative base and the sorely betrayed low-info Dems - when given a chance to communicate without being distorted by the cursed mass media.
Obamacare can and probably will be dismantled. Amnesty can not.
Presidents, judges, governors, each are referred to by their last title generally for life.
She seems to think that if folks comply and register, that absolves them of any subterfuge. That’s a very lame position to take.
Registering doesn’t change what they are or what they have been doing. They need to be repatriated.
We don’t have to do it, just cut off the freebies.
Yes, she is just parsing. She’s a populist. I’m not convinced she has the core convictions she tries to make folks think she does.
Murdoch is pro-amnesty
Murdoch started Fox News Latino
Murdoch just hired Palin...to what? Speak against “immigration reform” ?
You have a problem with that?
I asked you questions. Are you going to answer or spin?
There is a difference between being active and being former.
I appreciate the complimentary nature of your post.
One area I want to touch on is this premise.
I don’t know any dyed in the wool Conservatives who really know their stuff, who support legalization of the illegals inside our nation. They know the implications of such an occurrence.
Therefore, anyone supporting that has to be considered a person who isn’t (being charitable) nearly as in tune with Conservative norms as we need them to be.
Palin may mean well. That doesn’t mean that she is up to speed. I consider the immigration issue to be one that is a very telling test of values.
I can’t back her for office. Time will reveal what other things she isn’t solid on. I guarantee you they’ll start surfacing.
“IF THEY DON’T REGISTER... AND COMPLY WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS.”
If they do... they stay.
Well what we have now isn't working is it? So tell what and who is going to. When?
None of them are introduced as Inactive President Ronald Reagan and the like. Why are you still blowing smoke? You’ve been shot down on every point so far.
If they do... they stay.
What are the other requirements? Do you know?
” Well what we have now isn’t working is it?”
ENFORCE THE BLOODY LAWS ON THE BOOKS!!
I’m a Christian and I don’t support amnesty.
It doesn’t make any difference. Man are you thick.
What hoops could make it okay to legalize those who are here?
Exactly! It’s so damned simple. Sheesh!