Replies

It actually starts with me entering in at #179. Here is your answer to my post and your continued assault of what YOU claim she believes, what you tried to prove in every succeeding post that she believes. Anyone can follow the entire thread and it is filled with your assurance that she supports McCain, this bill, and amnesty; it reeks from every post you make. Anyone can follow our conversation and see what you were saying: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3030890/posts?page=180#180

Okay, in that post I stated that she agreed with McCain on immigration. The fact is that when I posted that it was before her speech today. I can’t read her mind. I can only go back and find her interviews and go by what she voiced in them.

I have never said she supported this immigration bill.

Her prior stated policy granted pathway and instant legal status. That is what McCain supports.

Since her statement today, I have not said she supported this bill. And even prior to that, I did not say that she supported the bill. I stated that her prior policy statement seemed to be pretty close to what is in this bill. I believe that to be accurate.

Simply saying you don’t want to reward lawbreakers doesn’t cut it when you voice objection to this bill for Palin, because she has actually said she won’t reward illegals, but then says in the same interview that by registering they are instantly legal.

If they don’t register, they have to leave. If they do register they can stay and work.

Palin can’t have it both ways.

She has still left it very vague what her true beliefs are. She doesn’t support this bill, she says, but her last interview of record says she supports a policy very similar to this bill.

The fact still stands, that you claimed I denied she came out against this bill, and I never said that. I listened to this morning’s speech, said some nice things about it and left it at that.

Once again, you’re being the old LakeShark. THIS is why I wasn’t buying into the game you were playing in the last day or so.