They were trying to protect Muslims back then too? Yes I am assuming that it was them!
It was on Clinton’s watch. He didn’t want any terrorist attacks, either. And really, after all these years -— WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE???
There was a lot of talk at the time of a “streak of light” that went from the beaches in Jersey to where the plane was climbing at the moment of the explosion. The media dropped the whole “SAM incident” question VERY quickly.
If a Dem’s in office, you can expect to be lied to. Hell, anymore, if a Rep’s in office, you can expect the same but at least the media will troll the conspiracy theories.
Without such protection of Islamic terrorism
THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO 911 ATROCITIES,
NO BOSTON ATROCITIES,
NO BENGHAZI ATROCITIES,
NO HASAN ATROCITIES,
NO COLE MURDERER RELEASE ATROCITIES,
etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.
But there was, and so it has gone.
Occam’s Razor Surmise: Clinton feared it was Iranian payback for the Vincennes incident and didn’t want to have to deal with just before the 1996 election. Jamie Gorelick commanded that it be an accident and Sandy Berger took credit for “discovering” the “faulty wiring”. Only in our great democracy could mere pencil pushers become both aviation and safety experts!
Berger later conveniently smuggled as many records as possible out of the National Archives to keep his duplicity from being uncovered.
Of course they were. Seems like we've been infiltrated for much longer than what we ever thought. The winds have indeed shifted in an ugly direction for us all.