Brand-new TWA 800 film to finally spill beans? (exposed corruption behind original investigation)

WND ^ | June 19, 2013 | Jack Cashill

[SkyDancer]

And I have read engineering reports and watched demonstrations on how it was possible. It is unfortunate that the results were ignored by people like yourself who want to believe that something else happened.

[haole]

having worked on designing all aspects of aircraft, military and commercial, you incorporate every thing you know on how to make planes safe, whether to be able to withstand a 23 mm cannon shell going thru the structure, to allowable crack growth, and fail safety.
the after takedown testing could not show any way for a minimal fuel / vapor in the tank being ignited from a low voltage source, even “arcing”.
to buttress those facts, the tell tale signs of the explosion blowing skin panels inward over the length of damage, force one to realize that the source of the explosion was external to the airframe.
for a limited amount of IQ as you seem to have, even a center tank explosion could not make a 4 ft hole in the forward fuselage, going up and thru the body.

as i said previously, the most credible witness, was a coast guard heli pilot who was flying near, at a lower altitude, when he saw rocket trails come up, and go over, and behind him, then saw the explosion.
you can dream that obama ia actually a good president all you want, but the facts demsonstrate the opposite.

[SkyDancer]

When people have a preconceived idea of a conspiracy plot and there are those that don't buy into it, those people instead of data put out innuendo as to the mental acuity of the person questioning it. It gains more to present evidence and have a meaningful and intelligent conversation than to cast aspersions to wit:

(sic - as you wrote) you can dream that obama ia actually a good president all you want, but the facts demsonstrate the opposite. .