IOW, you haven’t heard of a car “jackknifing” either. Waving your hands about, throwing verbiage at me does not conceal that fact that you cannot explain the observation made by another.
When you figure out what a “jackknifed” car looks like, get back to me. Until then, the witness is either witless or a liar. Your call. Any true “detective” will tell you the flimsiest evidence of a crime is an eyewitness.
Is this evidence of a larger crime? Damifino. Do I have an agenda? Hardly (you I’m not so sure about). I quit allowing people to stampede me into conspiracy theories a long, long time ago. I’m not about to start now.
I am not investigating a crime. I have not espoused any conspiracy theory. I have not been “waving my hands”. What you call flimsey eveidence is better than no evidence. You have zero evidence.
I don’t know what happened. The story is not right. If you want to assume with no evidence that the eyewitnesses are lying or “witless” go ahead. I don’t care.
Just don’t insult people who are interested in what really happened.