To: Telepathic Intruder
"For one reason, how do you arrange 51 stars on a flag?"
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
8 posted on
06/21/2013 10:36:45 PM PDT by
BigCinBigD
(...Was that okay?)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Odd, no sickle and hammer?
9 posted on
06/21/2013 10:42:05 PM PDT by
Theoria
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
It lacks symmetry but I suppose it would do. It would be better to add a couple more at the same time, so that we get something like #53. This gives Peurto Rico another shot. But the more important issue is this: are you really willing to live in a country with only one square state?
10 posted on
06/21/2013 10:49:35 PM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Nice job. Now I’m going to follow you around, hither and thither.
18 posted on
06/21/2013 11:33:05 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Cool. I was wondering how the flag would look like with additional states.
I see Obama’s mythical 57 state socialist republic.
I personally like the completely square ones or the ones with stars in all 4 corners. Two examples would be 54 stars and 59 stars respectively.
21 posted on
06/22/2013 2:00:32 AM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
28 posted on
06/22/2013 5:44:32 AM PDT by
Verbosus
(/* No Comment */)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson