It is not the actual risk that counts. It is what argument will be used by some scumbag lawyer for whomever gets shot while trying to commit a crime on school property.
With a “law enforcement officer” the shooter, a lawyer would have a harder time convincing a jury that his client was shot by a “crazed racist Tea Party survivalist right wing whacko”, and thus deserving of a multimillion dollar settlement. Of which said lawyer gets his 25-35%.
hey I hate insurance law and don’t do those case.
I am probably the least flush lawyer I know. Never did figure out how to “get on the gravy train” spend most of my time trying to help people
so
whatever bud