Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan
Doing a bit more reading, it seems like the Supreme Court is implying that only harassment by "a supervisor" is important. Does this mean that harassment by a coworker is not actionable?

"Workers Rights groups" are focusing hard on this case, by the way... and are very unhappy with the result... so I guess it can't be an entirely bad thing.

16 posted on 06/24/2013 7:30:59 AM PDT by Teacher317 (Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317

I think the point is that a ‘victim’ must now at least inform a hiring/firing management person is made aware of the complaint of the harassment and given an opportunity to fix the problem first before suing.


49 posted on 06/24/2013 9:29:51 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson