Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SAJ

I don’t see it. Granted this is politics not industry stuff. But I would guess our exports won’t be more than 10~20% of our production. Hard to figure any math that would keep our exports competitive and make any real difference. If we wait much longer, Australia, Canada, Qatar and others will capture enough of the global market, we won’t have customers to send it to.


13 posted on 06/27/2013 5:53:12 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
I'm not up to date on the current price of LNG in, particularly, Asia, but I know that fairly recently it was above $10/MMCF. Given the recent decline, I can hardly imagine it is lower than roughly $9.00. Give you $2.00 for transport (generously) and $1.50 for liquefaction, and that is still one hell of an arbitrage, right, mate?

And the $1.50 cost rates to drop considerably once the Cheniere and other facilities are on line, does it not?

This would seem to make exporting a much more attractive, hence a considerably larger, portion of the natty industry in future.

Not making an argument pro or con here -- just trying to get a handle on what MARKET forces, as opposed to goobermint fiat forces, may portend.

Best to you as always, mate.

15 posted on 06/27/2013 10:56:43 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson