Replies

And my only point was that it can’t be to the State’s advantage to have experts say they can’t tell who is screaming. If they think that’s to their advantage and bring it up themselves, they are nuts. They have to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. As long as it can’t be proven who’s screaming, that only helps Zimmerman’s case.

To remind jury that, hey, remember, we don’t know who was screaming, therefore it COULD have been Trayvonn, is just so, so...hopelessly confused from a proof standpoint.

I’m in no way critiquing you. For all I know, the State might be that “out of it”, that much living in a fantasy land of their own making by pursuing this case, and they might try to use it.

I’m just sayin’, it hurts them. But they might not know that?? Scary they might not.