Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot

The majority of the factual and scientific evidence favors young ages - not millions nor billions - even radio isotope decay has issues, assumptions, anomalies and major problems. Many confuse apparent time lapse with actual measured time lapse. Many are also duped by mainstream groupthink, [hint- which ideas generate the best money flow and carnival show].

For me personally I take the Biblical evidence first and foremost as most accurate, authoritative, and trustworthy. It’s not hard to see why others wear blinders to any facts that contradict long ages though [the Bible tells believers so].


36 posted on 07/03/2013 5:33:56 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: BrandtMichaels

At creation, was Adam young or mature?


37 posted on 07/03/2013 5:34:51 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: BrandtMichaels
The majority of the factual and scientific evidence favors young ages -

Based on your link? So what is the age, based on the majority of the factual and scientific evidence?

46 posted on 07/03/2013 7:21:26 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson