Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gadsden1st

“I also did not see any way O.J. would be found not guilty”

Two things that most people did not consider in the OJ trial.

1. Elizabeth Loftus, expert in selecting highly suggestible people was hired by the OJ lawyers to help select the jurors. She really knows her stuff, but has used it for the wrong purpose. This is the same evaluation techniques a stage hypnotist utilizes to select their subjects from an audience.

2. A friend of mine is an LA detective. He actually took Mark Furman’s case load when he left, worked with Mark and had the same boss. He mentioned to me that some of the blood collected on the murder scene on a sock had the chemical preservative that is placed in test tubes to preserve blood samples. Thus some of the blood was planted. He told me who he thought did it, but he was not sure. It was someone on the police force. That caused all evidence to be questioned.


48 posted on 07/01/2013 2:04:36 PM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: tired&retired
As to O.J. and his not guilty verdict, O.J. was filming a pilot in Southern California for 2 months before the murders. He was taught by former Navy Seals how to use a Navy Seal 'kill knife' used on the victims. (It is a counter intuitive blow for the untrained.)

Seals who assisted in the pilot production volunteered to come up from San Diego where the pilot was filmed and testify on behalf of the prosecution. The L.A. prosecutor's office declined and said "it was unnecessary." Either they were completely sure that they had an air tight case, or they knew the not guilty verdict months before.

57 posted on 07/01/2013 2:30:21 PM PDT by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson