Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

“The expert said he specifically could not exclude tm’s dna from the dna samples on the holster. IOW the governme can not say tm touched the holster!”

So, it’s a win-win for zim. No Martin DNA confirms zim story and also any Martin DNA supports zim story.

In any case, lots of zim blood confirms zim story


79 posted on 07/04/2013 8:20:07 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

no EXCLUSION of martin dna. There was more than just zim dna on the holster.


80 posted on 07/04/2013 8:22:11 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson