And idiocy like this shows why liberals continue to control the Senate every election cycle. In addition to the numerous marxist Dems we need to focus on defeating in 2014, there are easily half a dozen RINOs we could purge, all but one of which (Susan Collins of ME) is from a heavily GOP state. Saxby Chambliss, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Lamar Alexander, John Cornyn, and Thad Cochran are all to the left of Enzi and up in 2014.
But is anyone talking about recruiting high profile challengers to THEM? Nope. Liz Cheney and her fans on the internet think we should waste lots of time and money to purge an incumbent Senator from Wyoming who does what we want 95% of the time. Because a pampered politician's kid from a pro-gay marriage family is somehow "more conservative" than the guy who has already PROVEN to be a reliable vote on almost anything.
The libs on DailyKos LOVE this, seeing stupid conservatives eat their own and get distracted trying to "take out" Mike Enzi while numerous socialists in the Senate get a free pass.
You can support Cheney's kid if you want. I'm supporting Enzi if he runs for re-election and I hope she wises up in the future and uses her time to attack socialists from now on. Game on.
Sorry, I’m not following you. Any enthusiasm we show for Liz comes at the expense of would-be challengers to the red-state RINOs?
Maybe you can explain the math there. I want the best we can have for a given office.
Can we do better than Graham? Sure. Can we do better than Enzo? No doubt.
I have to pessimistically agree with Gogeo that the ship has likely sailed on queer marriage and it’s a matter time before half the country has it.
All the more reason to NOT reward traitors like the Cheney’s who helped the ship out of port.
And aside from that issue the Cheney name is political poison in 49 states, we don’t need or want one as a “leader”.
If Enzi is so bad (still not convinced) how’s about someone who’s actually better, not the daughter of the GOP establishment. Sounds like a lateral move at best.