Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

namely, that after examining the case for more than a year, the evidence has not changed.


It seems like the Holder squad could fix that easily enough. The MSM would be happy to go along with it.


2 posted on 07/15/2013 10:00:27 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf

Perhaps they need to interview Eloise Dilligard again...


4 posted on 07/15/2013 10:05:44 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Please Go there Eric!

If you think the heat was high a few months ago, bringing charges against Zimmerman now will create a firestorm for you. All thos people that weren’t paying attention over Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Black Panther voter Intimidation
will pay attention. They watched the trial of Zimmerman and know it was a partisan witch Hunt.

File your case and watch as the Democrats loose their new Negro (Mexican American) voters. It won’t be Nero that will force you out. It will be the Democrat Members of Congress knowing full well it could be a decider in the upcoming 14 election cycle.


6 posted on 07/15/2013 10:07:22 AM PDT by VRWCarea51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

Holder tries this case that we know that it is nothing but BS, the defense lawyers should go for very large personal sanctions and disbarment for any DOJ lawyers who would prosecute the case against Zimmerman.


13 posted on 07/15/2013 10:11:17 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

“namely, that after examining the case for more than a year, the evidence has not change”

“It seems like the Holder squad could fix that easily enough. The MSM would be happy to go along with it.”

Exactly my thought. I am sure they will find some “new” evidence or witness who did not come forward in the original case.


20 posted on 07/15/2013 10:17:14 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
"In 2007 Sharpton said he would have taken the case the same as he would today, with the only difference being that he would not have made it so personal against Pagones. He said that he still felt Brawley had a good case to go to trial. "I disagreed with the grand jury on Brawley," said Sharpton in an interview. "I believed there was enough evidence to go to trial. Grand jury said there wasn't. Okay, fine. Do I have a right to disagree with the grand jury? Many Americans believe O.J. Simpson was guilty. A jury said he wasn't. So I have as much right to question a jury as they do. Does it make somebody a racist? No! They just disagreed with the jury. So did I."

Double-Talking-Head. Own It.

24 posted on 07/15/2013 10:19:55 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Own it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf
Now That Zimmerman Is Not Guilty, He Can Go Back To Suing NBC For Allegedly Making Him Look Racist
30 posted on 07/15/2013 10:25:44 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

They’ll have no trouble finding someone to lie ... of course the liar then would not be able to read “their” allegation that they submitted in cursive so their testimony would have to be thrown out.

But - it should be enough to advance the cause and that’s what really counts - the seriousness of the charge rather than the nature of the evidence.


38 posted on 07/15/2013 10:36:18 AM PDT by Let's Roll (Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson