In some sense this shows they are the type of kids with western values who will at least save and maybe work and spend to get the things they want.
The only encouraging photo I saw was one that showed behavior that by Middle Eastern values could be considered, “female immodesty”.
Do you think that the wealthy in the Middle East *dislike* supercars and instead opt for very fancy camels...?
Do you think then when they can afford such vehicles they do NOT lord them over others...? They do, they absolutely do.
Mostly what I see here is the possibility that poor invaders are setting for a verrrry temporary simulacrum of wealth. They are failing to make long-term sacrifices towards the goal of building lasting wealth which would help a large and stable middle-class with values that are British, or more generally Western.
Do you want to owe, or do you want to OWN? These people will probably make the wrong choice, and British social largesse is as we see here enabling that wrong choice.
We see here a weird distortion provided by the viable welfare state provided by Western goverments —do you know who goes in for 2 or 3 wives in the Middle East? Very rich people.
Yet in Germany and England a FAR higher percent of poor Muslim immigrant men can opt for multiple wives than truely”rich” Muslim men back in the Old Country —why?
Because **Rupert and Fritz are the ones paying for the wives**, who as far as the law is concerned in those countries are concerned are STILL SINGLE.
Bottom line: Honest middle-class Europeans are being forced by their governments to finance the frivolty of invaders.