Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

A person born in the US to citizen parents would be a citizen without INA 301(a).


308 posted on 07/22/2013 1:00:44 PM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
A person born in the US to citizen parents would be a citizen without INA 301(a).

Then why wouldn't such a person be included under section (a): a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof?

310 posted on 07/22/2013 1:05:18 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76
A person born in the US to citizen parents would be a citizen without INA 301(a).

So INA 301(a)/8 USC § 1401(a) are simply declaratory, but (g) is an affirmative act? What about (b) through (f)--which ones are declaratory and which ones affirmative? On what basis do you make the distinction, other than your preferred outcome?

328 posted on 07/22/2013 2:22:58 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson