Even though that is not implied by the first statistic at all. If black men 14-24 are 27% of murderers, the remaining 73% includes black men outside that age range, black women, men and women of other non-white races ... and white men and women.
I’ve had enough conversations over the past ten days to convince me that whatever the first statistic shows, the inverse is all that will be seen, and what it actually shows is irrelevant. Logic, reason, and basic math are all out the window. The same goes for any statistics dealing with welfare. You could point out that the remaining 73% contains all sorts of people, but unless that group is over 50% black, all that will be heard is that whites commit more murders. If it is over 50%, then the statistic is racially biased. Then, after an extended discussion about the remaining 73%, all that will be retained is that 73% are not young, black men (therefore it’s whites). And I’m talking about “educated” people. The few who get it are “Uncle Toms”.